Head-to-Head Comparison · Updated March 2026
Two automation giants with fundamentally different philosophies. Make is the power user's choice; Zapier is the accessible standard. Here's when each wins — and the pricing math that might surprise you.
At a Glance
Contender A
Contender B
Cost Analysis
Make.com and Zapier use fundamentally different billing models. Understanding the real-world cost difference requires knowing how each platform counts "usage."
Make.com Plans
Billed per operation
Free
1,000 ops/mo · 2 active scenarios
$0
Core
10,000 ops/mo · Unlimited scenarios · API access
$10.59/mo
Pro
Core + priority execution · Custom variables · Full-text logs
$18.82/mo
Teams
Pro + AI agents · Team roles · Shared templates
$34.12/mo
Enterprise
SSO/SCIM · Audit logs · Custom volumes · 24/7 support
Custom
Zapier Plans
Billed per completed task
Free
100 tasks/mo · Single-step Zaps only
$0
Starter
750 tasks/mo · Multi-step Zaps · Filters/logic (free)
$19.99/mo
Professional
2,000 tasks/mo · Unlimited premium apps · Custom logic
$49/mo
Team
2,000 tasks/mo · Shared workspace · SSO
$69/mo
Enterprise
Custom tasks · Advanced security · SAML SSO · Audit logs
Custom
Important: How Billing Differs
Make.com charges for every operation step — triggers, filters, routers, and each action all count. A 5-step scenario with 1,000 executions = 5,000 operations. Zapier charges only for completed tasks. Filters, conditional logic (Paths), and formatting steps are free. A 5-step Zap with 1,000 executions = ~1,000 tasks (non-action steps are free). This makes Zapier's pricing appear worse but often fairer for logic-heavy workflows.
Feature Breakdown
| Feature | Make.com | Zapier | Edge |
|---|---|---|---|
| App integrations | 2,000+ | 7,000+ | Zapier wins |
| Workflow complexity (branching/iterators) | Excellent | Good | Make wins |
| Ease of setup for beginners | Moderate | Very Easy | Zapier wins |
| Pricing at scale (10k+ ops/mo) | $10–$19/mo | $49–$69/mo | Make wins |
| Free tier generosity | 1,000 ops/mo | 100 tasks/mo | Make wins |
| Real-time triggers | ✓ Instant | ✓ Instant (paid) | Tie |
| Visual workflow builder | Canvas/drag-drop | Linear steps | Make wins |
| Error handling & retry logic | ✓ Advanced (Pro+) | ~ Basic | Make wins |
| AI-powered Zap/scenario creation | ✓ Teams+ | ✓ Zapier AI | Tie |
| Custom API / HTTP module | ✓ Core+ | ✓ Webhooks+ | Tie |
| Data transformation (JSON, math) | Excellent | Basic | Make wins |
| Team collaboration features | Good (Teams+) | Good (Team plan) | Tie |
| SSO / SAML | Enterprise only | Team plan+ | Zapier wins |
| Audit logs | Enterprise only | Enterprise only | Tie |
| Community & templates library | Good | Excellent | Zapier wins |
Use Case Fit
The right choice depends less on which platform is "better" and more on your team's technical depth and automation complexity.
Choose Make.com if...
Choose Zapier if...
Editorial Verdict
AI Agent Square Recommendation
Make.com (8.8/10) is the stronger platform for teams with moderate technical depth who need complex, scalable automations. At the Core plan ($10.59/mo for 10,000 operations), Make offers dramatic cost advantages over Zapier at any meaningful scale. The visual canvas builder, advanced data transformation, iterators, and error handling make it the clear choice for operations teams building sophisticated workflows.
Zapier (8.6/10) remains the go-to for teams prioritizing ease of use and app breadth. With 7,000+ integrations — nearly 3.5x Make's library — Zapier handles the long tail of SaaS app connections that Make simply doesn't support yet. Zapier's AI features (Zapier AI, Copilot for Zap creation) and its beginner-friendly linear interface make it the default choice for non-technical teams who need automations running quickly without a learning curve.
For most enterprise teams: Use both. Zapier for quick wins connecting common SaaS apps; Make for complex data processing workflows where cost and logic depth matter. The average annual spend difference between the two platforms at moderate volume is $600–$1,200 — a small price for the right tool in the right context.
Common Questions
Is Make.com cheaper than Zapier?
In most real-world scenarios, yes — Make.com is significantly cheaper. Make's Core plan starts at $10.59/month for 10,000 operations, while Zapier's cheapest paid plan starts at $19.99/month for only 750 tasks. At scale, Make can be 10–22x cheaper per action. However, Make charges per every operation step (including filters and routers), while Zapier only charges for completed tasks, making true cost comparisons complex. Always benchmark against your actual workflow volume before committing.
Is Make.com better than Zapier for complex workflows?
Generally yes. Make.com's visual scenario builder supports complex branching logic, iterators, aggregators, error handling, and multi-path routing that would be very expensive or cumbersome in Zapier. For workflows with 6+ steps or conditional logic, Make is typically more powerful and cost-effective. Zapier is better for simple 2–3 step automations where ease of setup and a massive app library matter more than workflow complexity.
Does Make.com have more integrations than Zapier?
No. Zapier has approximately 7,000+ app integrations, significantly more than Make.com's 2,000+. This integration breadth is one of Zapier's key advantages, especially for niche or newer SaaS apps that haven't built a Make module yet. If your automation requires connecting a less common app, Zapier is more likely to have a pre-built connector.
Can I migrate from Zapier to Make.com?
There is no automated migration tool between Zapier and Make.com — you'll need to recreate your Zaps as Make scenarios manually. For simple linear workflows, the rebuild typically takes 15–30 minutes per workflow. For complex multi-step workflows, budget 1–3 hours per scenario. Many teams phase the migration, rebuilding high-volume automations first to capture the cost savings fastest.
Which is better for enterprise: Make or Zapier?
Both offer enterprise tiers with SSO, audit logs, and dedicated support. Zapier's Team plan ($69/mo) includes SSO at a lower tier than Make's Enterprise requirement. For large-scale deployments requiring advanced security, both platforms offer similar compliance features at the Enterprise level. Make has a slight edge in workflow governance and error visibility; Zapier has a larger partner ecosystem and more pre-built enterprise app connectors.
Keep Comparing